U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit Contract Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 829
Accelerated v. LMI II
as 23-6062
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ACCELERATED, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
LMI II, LLC
Five Points Management Group v. Campaign, et al
as 23-1125
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FIVE POINTS MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
CAMPAIGN, INC., a Delaware corporation and BRADLEY SEWELL, an individual
Garnishee:
HARTMAN ART STUDIOS, LLC
Fuel Automation v. Energera
as 23-1123
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FUEL AUTOMATION STATION, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
ENERGERA INC and ENERGERA INC.
Behavioral Medicine Consulting, LLC, et al v. CHG Companies, Inc.
as 23-4047
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE CONSULTING, LLC, a Montana limited liability company and KEITH BROWN, M.D., an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
CHG COMPANIES, INC., a Delaware corporation, DBA CompHealth
Unitednet, et al v. Tata Communications America, et al
as 23-2057
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITEDNET LTD. and LEVI RUSSELL
Defendant / Appellee:
TATA COMMUNICATIONS AMERICA, INC., TATA COMMUNICATIONS INDIA, TATA SONS PRIVATE, LTD. and others
Chesapeake Operating v. C.C. Forbes
as 23-6052
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CHESAPEAKE OPERATING, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
C.C. FORBES, LLC
Brody v. Bruner
as 23-1102
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID E. BRODY
Defendant / Appellee:
MARK E. BRUNER, as trustee of the Bruner Family Trust and THE BRUNER FAMILY TRUST
Tungsten Parts Wyoming v. Omanoff, et al
as 23-8018
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TUNGSTEN PARTS WYOMING, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
DENNIS OMANOFF, GEORGE PAZOS, GLOBAL TUNGSTEN AND POWDERS CORP. and others
Lenexa 95 Partners v. Kin, Inc.
as 23-3043
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LENEXA 95 PARTNERS, LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
KIN, INC., FKA Kohl's, Inc.
White & Weddle v. Shatar Holdings, et al
as 23-6032
Plaintiff / Appellant:
1005, LLC, AMF DEVELOPMENT, LLC, AMIR FARZANEH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SHATAR HOLDINGS, LLC, SHATAR CAPITAL, INC., EZRI NAMVAR and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
