U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 90
Lopez (Harwood) v. Cantex Health Care Centers II, et al
as 23-2045
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TODD LOPEZ, as personal representative of the wrongful death estate of Nellie Harwood
Defendant / Appellant:
CANTEX HEALTH CARE CENTERS II, LLC and FARMINGTON HEALTH CARE CENTER, LTD CO., DBA Cedar Ridge Inn
LaSala v. Millard, et al
as 22-1351
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMILY ROSE LASALA
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN A. MILLARD, M.D., P.C., in his individual capacity, MATTHEW B. BAKER, an individual and PHILLIPPE A. CAPRARO, MD.,PC, an individual
Robertson, et al v. IHC Health Services, et al
as 22-4046
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY ROBERTSON and WANPHEN ROBERTSON
Defendant / Appellee:
IHC HEALTH SERVICES, d/b/a Utah Valley Regional Medical Center, CRAIG S. COOK, MD PC, CRAIG S. COOK, M.D. and others
Defendant:
SAMER A. SALEH, M.D., KURT O. BODILY, M.D., THOMAS A. DICKINSON and others
Murphy, et al v. United States
as 21-2074
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DOMINIQUE BILLY, individually and as next friend of I.C. and S.D. minors, DENNIS P. MURPHY, Guardian Ad Litem for N.E.D., an incapacitated minor and JACOB DOTSON
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Leininger v. United States, et al
as 21-3031
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MARK E. WISNER
Plaintiff / Appellee:
AARON LEININGER
Schulze v. United States
as 20-5012
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LERA SCHULZE
Stokes, et al v. United States
as 19-7035
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. Indian Health Service & Chickasaw Nation Medical Center, an agency of the Chickasaw Nation
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEXIS STOKES, individually and as guardian and next friend of Baby Boy D.S., a minor and TAYLOR STOKES, individually and as guardian and next friend of Baby Boy D.S., a minor
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
