U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit Labor Cases

Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 51 - 60 of 362
Division 1181 Amalgamated Tran v. New York City Department of Ed
as 18-1877
Plaintiff - Appellee: Division 1181 Amalgamated Transit Union-New York Employees Pension Fund and Trustees
Defendant - Appellee: New York City Department of Education
Defendant: Safe Coach Bus Service, Inc., Safe Coach Bus, Inc. and Vinny's Bus Service, Inc.
Defendant - Appellant: B & M Escorts, Inc., Safe Coach, Inc., DiMino Express, Inc. and others
The 32BJ North Pension Fund v. Nutrition Management Service
as 18-1843
Plaintiff - Appellee: The 32BJ North Pension Fund and its Board of Trustees
Defendant - Appellant: Nutrition Management Services Company, AKA Nutrition Management Services Corp, AKA Nutrition Management Services, Inc
Division 1181 Amalgamated Tran v. New York City Department of Ed
as 18-1874
Plaintiff - Appellee: Division 1181 Amalgamated Transit Union-New York Employees Pension Fund and Trustees
Defendant - Appellee: New York City Department of Education
Defendant: Safe Coach Bus, Inc., Safe Coach Bus Service, Inc. and Vinny's Bus Service, Inc.
Defendant - Appellant: B & M Escorts, Inc., Safe Coach, Inc., Robert DiMino, Individually and others
Sullivan-Mestecky v. Verizon Communications Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-1591
Plaintiff - Appellant: Kristine Sullivan-Mestecky, Individually and as the beneficiary of the life insurance policy of Kathleen Sullivan, Deceased
Defendant - Appellee: Verizon Communications Inc., The Prudential Insurance Company of America, Wells Fargo Bank and others
Sacerdote v. Retirement Plan Committee We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-1558
Plaintiff - Appellant: Dr. Alan Sacerdote, individually and as representatives of class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the NYU School of Medicine Retirement Plan for Members of the Faculty, Professional Research Staff and Administration and the New York Universi, Dr. Herbert Samuels, individually and as representatives of class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the NYU School of Medicine Retirement Plan for Members of the Faculty, Professional Research Staff and Administration and the New York Univers, Marie E. Monaco, individually and as representatives of class of participants and beneficiaries on behalf of the NYU School of Medicine Retirement Plan for Members of the Faculty, Professional Research Staff and Administration and the New York University and others
Defendant - Appellee: Retirement Plan Committee, Michael Burke, Richard Bing and others
Defendant: NYU Langone Hospitals and NYU Langone Health System
New York Times Company v. Newspaper and Mail
as 18-1408
Plaintiff - Appellee: The New York Times Company
Defendant - Appellant: Newspaper and Mail Delivers'-Publishers' Pension Fund
Perez v. Bridgeport Health Care Center
as 18-1379
Plaintiff - Appellant: R. Alexander Acosta, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor
Defendant - Appellee: Bridgeport Health Care Center, Inc. and Chaim Stern, Individually
Trustees of the Local 813 Insu v. Rogan Brothers Sanitation, Inc
as 18-1274
Plaintiff - Appellant: Trustees of the Local 813 Insurance Trust Fund, The Local 813 Pension Trust Fund and The Local 813 and Local 1034 Severance and Retirement Trust Fund
Defendant - Appellee: A.R.J.R. Trucking Corp., ARJR Holding Company, Inc., Finne Bros. Carting, Inc. and others
Defendant: Rogan RR LLC
New York Times Company v. Newspaper and Mail
as 18-1140
Plaintiff - Appellant: The New York Times Company
Defendant - Appellee: Newspaper and Mail Delivers'-Publishers' Pension Fund
Patrico v. Voya Financial, Inc.
as 18-1057
Plaintiff - Appellant: Lisa Patrico, on behalf of The Nestle 401(K) Savings Plan and all other similarly situated Individual Account Plans
Defendant - Appellee: Voya Financial, Inc., Voya Institutional Plan Services, LLC, Voya Investments Management, LLC and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?