U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit Contract Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 1,436
Mawule Tepe v. Javitch Block LLC, et al
as 23-6088
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
JAVITCH BLOCK LLC and BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Mawule Tepe v. Bank of America, N.A.
as 23-6090
Petitioner / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Mawule Tepe v. Bank of America, N.A., et al
as 23-6091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS, LLP, Law Firm and FRANKIE NEIL SPERO, Attorney
Mawule Tepe v. Truist Financial Corporation
as 23-6098
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
TRUIST FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Mawule Tepe v. Travis R. McDonough, et al
as 23-6092
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
TRAVIS RANDALL MCDONOUGH, in his U.S. District Chief Judge position, JANE DOE, I, U.S. District Court's Clerk at Chattanooga, TN, in her personal position, JANE DOE, II, U.S. District Court's Clerk at Chattanooga, TN, in her personal position and others
Mawule Tepe v. Bank of America, N.A., et al
as 23-6089
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and JAVITCH BLOCK LLC
Ricardo Martinez-Porte v. Multi-Color Corporation, et al
as 23-3971
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICARDO MARTINEZ-PORTE
Defendant / Appellee:
MULTI-COLOR CORPORATION and W/S PACKAGING GROUP, INC.
David Sifuentes, III v. AT&T Mobility, LLC
as 23-2047
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID ANGEL SIFUENTES, III
Defendant / Appellee:
AT&T MOBILITY, LLC
Breeders' Cup Ltd, et al v. Nuvei Tech, Inc.
as 23-5953
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BREEDERS' CUP LIMITED and BREEDERS' CUP PROPERTIES, LLC
Defendant / Appellant:
NUVEI TECHNOLOGIES, INC., fka Pivotal Payments Inc.
Jacob Sparks v. Justin Fitzhugh
as 23-3875
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACOB D. SPARKS
Defendant / Appellee:
JUSTIN FITZHUGH
Intervenor / Appellee:
NATIONS LENDING CORPORATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
