U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit Forfeiture / Penalty Cases
Cases 11 - 19 of 19
USA, et al v. One Ezonics Excam Model P35U1, et al
as 12-1869
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellant:
CHARLES A. BURT, Claimant
Defendant:
ONE EZONICS EXCAM MODEL P35U1 USB WEBCAM, Bearing Serial Number 91810U001323, ONE CANNON POWERSHOT A70 DIGITAL CAMERA, Bearing Serial Number 6722228597, ONE NIKON CL30S 24MM LENS, Bearing Serial Number 642839 and others
Igor V. Aslan v. USA
as 12-1783
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IGOR V. ASLAN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Marshall Pecore, et al
as 10-3599
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARSHALL PECORE and CONRAD WANIGER
Shawano Gun & Loan, L.L.C. v. Mary Hughe
as 10-2927
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAWANO GUN & LOAN, L.L.C., doing business as SHAWANO GUN & LOAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY JO HUGHES, Director of Industry Operations, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
USA v. Marshall Pecore, et al
as 10-2676
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARSHALL PECORE and CONRAD WANIGER
USA, et al v. 5443 Suffield Terrace, Skokie,
as 09-1143
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellant:
RICHARD S. CONNORS
Defendant:
5443 SUFFIELD TERRACE, SKOKIE, ILLINOIS
USA, et al v. Fleischi, Donna
as 08-4063
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellant:
DONNA FLEISCHLI
Defendant:
MISCELLANEOUS FIREARMS, EXPLOSIVES, DESTRUCTIVE DEVICES AND AMMUNITION
USA v. Approximately 81,454 Cans of B
as 08-2637
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Appellant:
KALOTI WHOLESALE INCORPORATED
Defendant:
APPROXIMATELY 81,454 CANS OF BABY FORMULA
William Dickerson v. USA
as 08-1779
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM D. DICKERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.