U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit Federal Tax Suits Cases

Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 271
USA v. Franchise Tax Board of CA
as 17-16837
Plaintiff - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JAMES O. MOLEN, SANDRA L. MOLEN, BLACK HOLE ADVENTURES (TRUST)
Defendant - Appellee: FRANCHISE TAX BOARD OF CALIFORNIA
Ross Massbaum, et al v. USA
as 17-56262
Plaintiff - Appellant: ROSS MASSBAUM, FLORINA MASSBAUM
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Erroneously Sued As Internal Revenue Service
USA v. Wen-Bing Soong
as 17-16656
Petitioner - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent - Appellee: WEN-BING SOONG
USA v. Hsin-Jung Soong
as 17-16657
Petitioner - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent - Appellee: HSIN-JUNG SHIRLEY SOONG
Jeffrey Rische v. USA, et al
as 17-35591
Plaintiff - Appellant: JEFFREY ALAN RISCHE
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES TREASURY, UNITED STATES INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, AKA IRS
USA v. Nora Brayshaw
as 17-16327
Petitioner - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent - Appellant: NORA BRAYSHAW
USA v. James G. Hood, et al
as 17-35401
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: JAMES G. HOOD, KAREN J. HOOD
Defendant: DENTAL CARE ASSOCIATES OF SPOKANE VALLEY, PS, DR. JAMES G. HOOD FAMILY DENTISTRY, AKA James G. Hood Family Dentistry PS, AKA Spokane Valley Dental Care, DR JAMES G HOOD DDS MA PS, AKA James G Hood DDS PS, AKA James G. Hood DDS MA PS and others
Interior Glass Systems, Inc. v. USA
as 17-15713
Plaintiff - Appellant: INTERIOR GLASS SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Raghvendra Singh
as 17-15659
Petitioner - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent - Appellant: RAGHVENDRA SINGH
Howard Baldwin, et al v. USA
as 17-55354
Plaintiff - Appellee: HOWARD L. BALDWIN, KAREN BALDWIN
Defendant - Appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?