US District Court for the Central District of California Contract Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 187
Celestial International Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Kross Precision Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02252
Plaintiff:
Celesta International Electronics Co LTD
Defendant:
Leslie Dotson, Kross Precision Inc., Kross Precision Inc. and others
Mabrouk v. SANDERSON/CARDINAL DEVELOPMENT-BRISTOL CENTER et al
as 8:2017cv00413
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, inclusive and SANDERSON/CARDINAL DEVELOPMENT-BRISTOL CENTER
Plaintiff:
Maged Mabrouk
Erin Hughes et al v. Travelers Commercial Insurance Company
as 2:2017cv01392
Defendant:
DOES, Farmers Insurance Group, Foremost Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
Erin Hughes and Robert Hughes
LVGV, LLC v. National Cash Services, Inc.
as 8:2017cv00012
Petitioner:
LVGV, LLC
Respondent:
National Cash Services, Inc.
Georgetown, LLC v. Kolbeh Capital, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv08582
Defendant:
Dennis Adelpour, Alta Mira Investments, Inc., Berkshire Hathaway Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Georgetown, LLC
Peter Noce et al v. Amtrust International Underwriters, Ltd. et al
as 2:2016cv08415
Defendant:
Amtrust International Underwriters Limited, Amtrust International Underwriters, Ltd. and Does
Plaintiff:
Margaret Noce and Peter Noce
ABC Arbitrage S. A. v. Herve Caen
as 2:2016cv07014
Plaintiff:
ABC Arbitrage S. A.
Defendant:
Herve Caen
In Re Paul Gregory Katona et al
as 5:2016cv01575
In Re Debtor:
Gail Marie Katona and Paul Gregory Katona
Defendant:
Gail Marie Katona and Paul Gregory Katona
Plaintiff:
Royce Napoli
In Re Paul Gregory Katona et al
as 5:2016mc00010
In Re Debtor:
Gail Marie Katona and Paul Gregory Katona
Defendant:
Gail Marie Katona and Paul Gregory Katona
Plaintiff:
Royce Napoli
Zurich American Insurance Company v. Sealink Insurance Services Corp., et al
as 2:2016cv04301
Defendant:
DOES, Phann Gelinda Keo, Leang K. Lim and others
Plaintiff:
Zurich American Insurance Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
