US District Court for the Central District of California Social Security Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 68
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. Michael Leavitt
as 2:2008cv07554
Plaintiff:
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Defendant:
Michael Leavitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Soghra Farahi v. Michael J Astrue et al
as 8:2008cv00401
Plaintiff:
Soghra Farahi
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue, Medicare and National Heritage Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Fildelis Diagnostics Inc v. Mike Leavitt et al
as 2:2008cv02061
Plaintiff:
Fildelis Diagnostics Inc and Fildelis Diagnostics Inc
Defendant:
Mike Leavitt and United States Secretary of Health and Humand Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Fidelis Diagnostics Inc. et al v. Mike Leavitt et al
as 2:2008cv02062
Plaintiff:
Fidelis Diagnostics Inc. and Fidelis Diagnostics Inc.
Defendant:
Mike Leavitt and United States Secretary of Health and Humand Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Fidelis Diagnostics Inc. v. Mike Leavitt et al
as 2:2008cv02059
Plaintiff:
Fidelis Diagnostics Inc. and Fidelis Diagnostics Inc.
Defendant:
Mike Leavitt and United States Secretary of Health and Human Resources
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Robert I Bourseau et al. v. Michael Leavitt
as 2:2007cv07430
Plaintiff:
Robert I Bourseau and Rudra Sabaratnam
Defendant:
Michael Leavitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Rehabilitation Institute At Santa Barbara v. Michael O Leavitt
as 2:2007cv03808
Plaintiff:
Rehabilitation Institute At Santa Barbara and Rehabilitation Institute At Santa Barbara
Defendant:
Michael O Leavitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
