US District Court for the Central District of California Social Security Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 7,190
Mike Bowman v. Martin J. O Malley
as 5:2024cv00858
Plaintiff:
Mike Bowman
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Alfonso Lepe v. Martin J. OMalley
as 5:2024cv00840
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Lepe
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Noe Valdez v. Martin OMalley
as 2:2024cv03339
Plaintiff:
Noe Valdez
Defendant:
Martin OMalley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Mathew P. W. v. Martin O Malley
as 5:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
Mathew P. Wilson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rolounda Vernea Robinson v. Martin O Malley
as 5:2024cv00813
Plaintiff:
Rolounda Vernea Robinson
Defendant:
Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Rosalyn Unique McGee v. Martin J. O Malley
as 5:2024cv00803
Plaintiff:
Rosalyn Unique McGee
Defendant:
Martin J. O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Juan Carlos Vizaga v. Martin J. O Malley
as 5:2024cv00786
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Vizaga
Defendant:
Martin J. O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jennifer Lynn Retich v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv02984
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER LYNN RETICH
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Keyonna Jacarie Bateman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv02943
Plaintiff:
Keyonna Jacarie Bateman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Timothy Riha v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00763
Plaintiff:
Timothy Riha
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
