US District Court for the Eastern District of California Contract Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 311
Bechakas v. Pandher
as 1:2015mc00014
Defendant:
Pandher and Harchand Pandher
Plaintiff:
Bechakas and George Bechakas
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
BECHAKAS v. PANDHER
as 1:2015at00236
Plaintiff:
GEORGE BECHAKAS
Defendant:
HARCHAND PANDHER
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
National Association of Government Employees, Inc. v. Colcord
as 2:2015mc00025
Plaintiff:
National Association of Government Employees, Inc.
Defendant:
Torren Colcord
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
National Association of Government Employees v. Colcord
as 2:2015at00355
Plaintiff:
National Association of Government Employees
Defendant:
Torren K Colcord
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Chico Unified School District v. IG Properties Ltd, LLC et al
as 2:2015at00201
Plaintiff:
Chico Unified School District
Defendant:
IG Properties Ltd, LLC and Albert G Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Chico Unified School District v. IG Properties, et al
as 2:2015cv00325
Plaintiff:
Chico Unified School District
Defendant:
IG Properties Ltd, LLC and Albert G Garland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Chubb Insurance v. Goldstein
as 2:2014mc00127
Plaintiff:
Chubb Insurance
Defendant:
Douglas Howard Goldstein
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Chubb Insurance v. Goldstein
as 2:2014at01345
Plaintiff:
Chubb Insurance
Defendant:
Douglas Howard Goldstein
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
MyECHeck, Inc. v. Zipmark, Inc. et al
as 2:2014at01287
Plaintiff:
MyECHeck, Inc.
Defendant:
Zipmark, Inc. and Jay Bhattacharya
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
MyECHeck, Inc. v. Zipmark, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02399
Plaintiff:
MyECHeck, Inc.
Defendant:
Zipmark, Inc. and Jay Bhattacharya
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
