US District Court for the Eastern District of California Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 2,070
Kalwani v. Michael Kors (USA), Inc., et al
as 2:2024cv00746
Plaintiff:
Dylan Kalwani
Defendant:
Michael Kors (USA), Inc., Michael Kors Retail, Inc. and Michael Kors Stores (California), LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jackson v. Target Corp.
as 2:2024at00180
Plaintiff:
Dawn Jackson
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jackson v. Target Corp.
as 2:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Dawn Jackson
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Avalos v. Costco Wholesale Corp.
as 2:2024cv00515
Plaintiff:
Irma Avalos
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Murphy v. Confirm ID, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Ryan Murphy
Defendant:
Confirm ID, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
L.D. v. Lovehoney LLC
as 2:2024at00167
Plaintiff:
L.D.
Defendant:
Lovehoney LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MARY MOE, as next friend for RAVEN et al v. Horwath
as 2:2024at00172
Plaintiff:
MARY MOE, as next friend for RAVEN, LILY, SARAH and others
Defendant:
Timothy Allen Horwath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
L.D. v. Lovehoney LLC
as 2:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
L.D.
Defendant:
Lovehoney LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Moe, et al., v. Horwath
as 2:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
Mary Moe, Lily, Sarah and others
Defendant:
Timothy Allen Horwath
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Herrera v. Walmart, Inc.
as 1:2024at00149
Plaintiff:
Sonia Andrade Herrera
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
