US District Court for the Southern District of California Contract Cases

Miller Act Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 51 - 60 of 189
United States for the use and benefit of National Construction and Maintenance, Inc. et al v. Pacific Plumbing Service, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00609
Plaintiff: United States for the use and benefit of National Construction and Maintenance, Inc. and National Construction and Maintenance, Inc.
Defendant: Pacific Plumbing Service, Inc., Twins Roofing, Inc. and International Fidelity Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Type: Contract Miller Act
Angus Asphalt, Inc. v. Nei Contracting and Engineering, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00554
Plaintiff: Angus Asphalt, Inc.
Defendant: Nei Contracting and Engineering, Inc., Doe Surety 1 and Does Surety 2
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America v. K.O.O. Construction, Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00368
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: K.O.O. Construction, Inc. and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America, for the use and benefit of Fens Associates, LLC, et al. v. K.O.O. Construction, Inc. , et al.
as 3:2016cv00258
Plaintiff: United States of America, for the use and benefit of Fens Associates, LLC and Parron-Hall Corporation
Defendant: K.O.O. Construction, Inc. and Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
Penn Air Control Inc v. Bilbro Construction Company, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00003
Plaintiff: Penn Air Control Inc
Defendant: Bilbro Construction Company, Inc. and International Fidelity Insurance Company
Counter_defendant: Alpha Mechanical, Inc. , Penn Air Control Inc , Ferguson Pape Baldwin Architects, Inc. and others
Counter_claimant: Bilbro Construction Company, Inc. and Alpha Mechanical, Inc.
Miscellaneous_party: United States of America
Cross_defendant: Sparling, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Inc. v. APR Construction, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv02904
Plaintiff: United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Consolidated Electrical Distributors, Inc.
Defendant: APR Construction, Inc. and American Contractors Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Hudson P. Davis, Inc. v. K.O.O. Construction, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv02869
Plaintiff: United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of Hudson P. Davis, Inc.
Defendant: K.O.O. Construction, Inc., Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America and Does 1 through 20
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Ahern Rentals, Inc. et al v. Bonita Pipeline, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv02776
Plaintiff: United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Ahern Rentals, Inc. and Ahern Rentals, Inc.
Defendant: Bonita Pipeline, Inc., Barnhart-Balfour Beatty, Inc., Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3133
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of: Frazier Masonry Corporation v. RQ Construction, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv02621
Plaintiff: United States of America, for the Use and Benefit of: Frazier Masonry Corporation
Defendant: RQ Construction, LLC , Liberty Mutual Insurance Company , Continental Casualty Company and others
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act
United States of America et al v. KISAQ RQ 8A 2JV et al
as 3:2015cv02286
Plaintiff: United States of America and Frazier Masonry Corporation
Defendant: KISAQ RQ 8A 2JV , Federal Insurance Company and Western Surety Company
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Type: Contract Miller Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?