US District Court for the Southern District of California Contract Cases
Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Sharp Coronado Hospital and Healthcare Center v. Sebelius
as 3:2009cv02299
Plaintiff:
Sharp Coronado Hospital and Healthcare Center
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Pfingsten v. Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc. et al
as 3:2009cv00029
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10 and Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ronald Pfingsten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 bc
Madsen v. Sebelius
as 3:2008cv02236
Plaintiff:
Roy P. Madsen
Defendant:
Kathleen Sebelius and Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Vahidallah v. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Service - CMS
as 3:2008cv00843
Plaintiff:
Hussain D Vahidallah
Defendant:
Center for Medicare and Medicaid Service - CMS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sussman v. Sani et al
as 3:2008cv00392
Plaintiff:
Freda Sussman
Defendant:
Armelia Sani, Shiley Eye Center, UCSD Medical Center and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Vestevich v. United States of America et al
as 3:2008cv00027
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Vestevich
Defendant:
United States of America, Centers For Medicare and Medicaid Services and CNI Administration Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Sharp Chula Vista Medical Center v. Leavitt
as 3:2007cv01737
Plaintiff:
Sharp Chula Vista Medical Center
Defendant:
Michael Leavitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
El Centro Regional Medical Center v. Leavitt
as 3:2007cv01182
Plaintiff:
El Centro Regional Medical Center
Defendant:
Michael Leavitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Home Wellness West v. Secretary of Health
as 3:2004cv00826
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395 HHS: Adverse Reimbursement Review
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
