District of Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 3,685
Speer v. Colorado Board of Parole et al
as 1:2016cv02947
Cause Of Action: - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stephens v. State of Colorado
as 1:2016cv02904
Petitioner: Eric J. Stephens
Respondent: State of Colorado
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
St. James v. Archuleta et al
as 1:2016cv02878
Petitioner: Steven Mark St. James
Respondent: Lou Archuleta, Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Strauss v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2016cv02879
Petitioner: Nathaniel Lee Strauss
Respondent: Rick Raemisch, Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vargas-Ortiz v. Goetz
as 1:2016cv02880
Petitioner: Raul A. Vargas-Ortiz
Respondent: C.R. Goetz
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Houston v. No Named Respondents
as 1:2016cv02883
Petitioner: Jeramiah N. Houston
Respondent: No Named Respondents
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Leyba v. Archuleta et al
as 1:2016cv02868
Petitioner: Clifford Leyba
Respondent: Archuleta, Attorney General of the State of Colorado, The
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guevara v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2016cv02869
Petitioner: Mathew Guevara
Respondent: Rick Raemisch, Cynthia Coffman
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Archuleta et al
as 1:2016cv02837
Petitioner: Kenneth Paul Rodriguez
Respondent: Lou Archuleta, Attorney General of the State of Coloardo, The
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carrico et al v. Colorado Board of Parole, et al
as 1:2016cv02841
Petitioner: Marie Carrico, Gary Carrico
Respondent: Colorado Board of Parole, et al, Denise Balazic
Cause Of Action: Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?