United States Federal Claims Court Contract Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 1,022
AM PIERCE & ASSOCIATES, INC. v. USA
as 1:2024cv00836
Plaintiff:
AM PIERCE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor:
WAVELINK, INC., CEPEDA SYSTEMS & SOFTWARE ANALYSIS, INC., MONTE SANO RESEARCH CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
INTELLECT JV LLC v. USA
as 1:2024cv00797
Plaintiff:
INTELLECT JV LLC
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
DECISIONPOINT CORPORATION v. USA
as 1:2024cv00782
Plaintiff:
DECISIONPOINT CORPORATION
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
EDUCATION CREDITOR TRUST et al v. USA
as 1:2024cv00775
Plaintiff:
EDUCATION CREDITOR TRUST and U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
TWO KNIGHTS DEFENSE, LLC v. USA
as 1:2024cv00750
Plaintiff:
TWO KNIGHTS DEFENSE, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor:
FIVE STONES RESEARCH CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. USA
as 1:2024cv00740
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
G2 OPS, INC. v. USA
as 1:2024cv00718
Plaintiff:
G2 OPS, INC.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
ARDENT MANAGEMENT CONSULTING, LLC v. USA
as 1:2024cv00695
Plaintiff:
ARDENT MANAGEMENT CONSULTING, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor:
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
FREEDOM TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, LLC v. USA
as 1:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
FREEDOM TECHNOLOGY PARTNERS, LLC
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
CAN SOFTTECH INC. v. USA
as 1:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
CAN SOFTTECH INC.
Defendant:
USA
Intervenor:
THE GREENTREE GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
