United States Federal Claims Court
Cases 1 - 10 of 15,656
DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP v. USA
as 1:2025cv00667
Plaintiff:
DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
BINGHAM et al v. USA
as 1:2025cv00660
Plaintiff:
GREGORY C. BINGHAM and TERRI C. BINGHAM
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
MCDANIEL v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2025vv00666
Petitioner:
JULIA MCDANIEL
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
ALEXANDRESCU v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2025vv00662
Petitioner:
SIGRID RALUCA ALEXANDRESCU
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
NEWTON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2025vv00664
Petitioner:
LAUREN ELIZABETH NEWTON
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
RICHARDSON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2025vv00665
Petitioner:
SYLVIA RICHARDSON
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
CGI FEDERAL INC. v. USA
as 1:2025cv00659
Plaintiff:
CGI FEDERAL INC.
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
BIGELOW v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2025vv00658
Petitioner:
PAULA BIGELOW
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
AYERS v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2025vv00656
Petitioner:
DARRYL AYERS
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
SORENSEN v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2025vv00657
Petitioner:
STEVEN SORENSEN
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
