US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia Contract Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 94
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY v. CHERRY-AVANT PLANTATION LLC et al
as 5:2012cv00314
Plaintiff:
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY
Defendant:
CHERRY AVANT PLANTATION LLC and J RUSSELL LIPFORD, JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Regions Bank v. Bosch et al
as 7:2012cv00039
Plaintiff:
Regions Bank
Defendant:
BARTHOLOMEW J BOSCH and Lena D Bosch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY v. RP INVESTMENT GROUP LLC et al
as 4:2011cv00179
Plaintiff:
BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY
Defendant:
RP INVESTMENT GROUP LLC and RANDALL G PEREZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gill v. NICOL
as 4:2011cv00168
Plaintiff:
Loren C Gill
Defendant:
JAY NICOL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SYNOVUS BANK v. SHANNON STROBEL & WEAVER et al
as 4:2011cv00147
Plaintiff:
SYNOVUS BANK
Defendant:
SHANNON STROBEL AND WEAVER CONSTRUCTORS AND ENGINEERS INC, MICHAEL V SHANNON, DAVID L STROBEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SYNOVUS BANK v. ECAA LLC et al
as 4:2011cv00144
Plaintiff:
SYNOVUS BANK
Defendant:
ECAA LLC and MICHAEL V SHANNON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SYNOVUS BANK v. SSW & BUSH CONTRACTORS LLC et al
as 4:2011cv00146
Plaintiff:
SYNOVUS BANK
Defendant:
SSW AND BUSH CONTRACTORS LLC , MICHAEL V SHANNON , DOUGLAS C BUSH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GEO D WARTHEN BANK v. KLESKO
as 5:2011cv00373
Plaintiff:
GEO D WARTHEN BANK
Defendant:
RYAN A KLESKO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Empire Financial Services Inc v. REYNOLDS
as 5:2011cv00335
Plaintiff:
Empire Financial Services Inc
Defendant:
MERCER REYNOLDS, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRANCH BANKING AND TRUST COMPANY v. SCHORR et al
as 4:2011cv00085
Plaintiff:
BRANCH BANKING & TRUST COMPANY
Defendant:
SPENCER G SCHORR, MIDSOUTH RENTALS LLC and CHEROKEE DEVELOPERS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
