US District Court for the Northern District of Georgia Other Statutes Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 574
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Taqueria Oaxaquena, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01944
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Taqueria Oaxaquena, Inc. and Lucio O. Cruz Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 551
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Bolden
as 1:2017cv01955
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Michelle R. Bolden
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 551
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Mega Taco, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01863
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Mega Taco, Inc. and Miguel G Garcia, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 551
Isom v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 1:2017cv01846
Plaintiff:
Tabitha Isom
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v Nguyen
as 1:2017cv01594
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Hiep Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 551
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Vasquez Yasin, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv01539
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Vasquez Yasin, LLC and Andres F. Vasquez
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 551
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. D.R. Enterprises, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv01495
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
D.R. Enterprises, LLC and Cordaveious D. Brown
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 551
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Lopez Tomayo
as 4:2017cv00075
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Jose M. Lopez Tomayo
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Chamoys Promotions Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01416
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Chamoys Promotions Inc. and Zoilo A. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 551
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Hudson
as 1:2017cv01318
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Wanda D. Hudson
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
