US District Court for the District of Hawaii Torts - Property Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 93
Alexio v. Obama et al
as 1:2015cv00209
Plaintiff:
Dennis Raymond Alexio
Defendant:
Barack Obama and Jacob Lew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tharp v. Complete Payment Recovery Services, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00095
Plaintiff:
James W. Tharp
Defendant:
Complete Payment Recovery Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Doe v. Jones
as 1:2014cv02000
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
John E. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Rabaino v. Safeway Inc.
as 1:2014cv00311
Defendant:
Safeway Inc. and Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
Lalaine Rabaino
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kishida vs. Iyoki
as 1:2014cv00283
Plaintiff:
Yuki Kishida
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409
Pearl Ultra Lounge, LLC v. Italian Restaurant # 1, LLC.
as 1:2013cv00417
Plaintiff:
Pearl Ultra Lounge, LLC
Defendant:
Italian Restaurant # 1, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Konishi v. Wakai et al
as 1:2013cv00356
Plaintiff:
Christopher Masayuki Konishi
Defendant:
Eugene Wakai and Doe Defendants 1 -- 20
Trustee:
Eugene Wakai
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Ludlow et al v. Lowe's Companies, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv00476
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Ludlow and Kathelyn Ludlow
Defendant:
Lowe's Companies, Inc. , Lowe's Home Centers, Inc. , Lowe's HIW, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Benedict et al v. Diamond Resorts Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00183
Defendant:
Frank Goeckel, Resort Management International, Inc., Diamond Resorts Holdings, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Schmadeke, Joe Williams, James Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kapuwai et al v. Petco Animal Supplies Stores, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00167
Plaintiff:
Gladys Kapuwai and Estelle Green
Defendant:
Petco Animal Supplies Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
