US District Court for the Southern District of Iowa Other Statutes Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 230
Anderung v. Anderung
as 4:2013cv00080
Plaintiff:
Magnus Anderung
Defendant:
Raina Anderung
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 International Child Abduction Remedies Act
Hanevy v. Apex Capital Solutions, LLC
as 4:2013cv00034
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Hanevy
Defendant:
Apex Capital Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Monson v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 4:2012cv00616
Plaintiff:
Jay Alan Monson and Elite Commerce, LLC
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
In Re: Attorney Admissions
as 4:2012at00001
Defendant:
Attorney Admissions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Attorney Biennial Fees Only
as 4:2012at02012
Petitioner:
Attorney Biennial Fees Only
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith et al v. United States Department of Agriculture et al
as 4:2012cv00362
Plaintiff:
Ruby L Smith , Mark Mendenhall , Mark D Boles and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture , Thomas J Vilsack , Farm Service Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
Copp v. American Enterprise Services Company et al
as 4:2012cv00216
Plaintiff:
Bruce Copp
Defendant:
American Enterprise Services Company and American Republic Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3731
Habyarimana et al v. Kagame et al
as 4:2012cv00191
Plaintiff:
Madame Habyarimana and Madame Ntaryamira
Defendant:
Paul Kagame, Pierre Propser, Ann Fields and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Smith v. United States Department of Agriculture
as 4:2012cv00171
Plaintiff:
Ruby L Smith , Mark Mendenhall , Mark D Boles and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Agriculture , Thomas J Vilsack , Farm Service Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
