US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 1,787
Trotter v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv04025
Plaintiff:
Marcus A. Trotter
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Yarrow v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03968
Plaintiff:
Jacob A. Yarrow
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Tate v. O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv03922
Plaintiff:
Carl Lee Tate
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Garrison v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03815
Plaintiff:
Kayla Garrison
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hurt v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03827
Plaintiff:
Reginald Hurt
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hargrove, ex rel. T.H. et al vs O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03790
Plaintiff:
Terrence Hargrove, ex rel. T.H., a minor
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
TODARO v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03762
Plaintiff:
JAMES TODARO
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Wagner v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03353
Plaintiff:
Timothy S. Wagner
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rybicki v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv03214
Plaintiff:
John Rybicki
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jahinsha v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03192
Plaintiff:
Ms. Nahrain Jahinsha
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 425 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
