US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 701
The Church at Jackson v. Hinds County
as 3:2021cv00298
Plaintiff:
The Church at Jackson
Defendant:
Hinds County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lentz v. National Debt Relief, LLC
as 1:2021cv00143
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court-Gulfport
Defendant:
National Debt Relief, LLC
Trustee:
United States Trustee
Plaintiff:
Kimberly R. Lentz
United States of America v. Johnson
as 2:2021mc00061
Defendant:
William Lyle Johnson
Plaintiff:
United States of America
STRINGER v. DOWNY et al
as 3:2021cv00257
Defendant:
Jim Hood, UNKNOWN DRUG AGENT, Marshall Fisher and others
Plaintiff:
Charles L. Stringer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Google, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv00053
Defendant:
Google Payment Corp. and Google, LLC
Plaintiff:
Edgar Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Buie v. Medical Data Systems, Inc.
as 5:2021cv00037
Plaintiff:
Linda Buie
Defendant:
Medical Data Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of Waynesboro, Mississippi v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv00044
Defendant:
Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Actavis Pharma, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceutica Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Waynesboro, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bond Pharmacy v. Advanced Health Systems, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00123
Defendant:
Advanced Health Systems, Inc. and Blue Cross & Blue Shield of Mississippi, A Mutual Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Bond Pharmacy doing business as Advanced Infusion Solutions
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Ramazani v. Bourque et al
as 1:2021cv00034
Plaintiff:
Ramazan Ramazani
Defendant:
Signs Plus, Inc. and Ira Charles Bourque
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6702
Knight v. CBC Recovery, Inc.
as 2:2021cv00015
Defendant:
CBC Recovery, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Jessica Knight
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
