US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi Real Property Cases

Land Condemnation Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 31 - 40 of 167
United States of America v. Picayune Wood Treating Site/Snyder Property We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00218
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Picayune Wood Treating Site/Snyder Property
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
Type: Real Property None
Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP v. 19.80 acres located in Hinds County, MS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00372
Plaintiff: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP, Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP, Gulf South Pipeline Company, LP
Defendant: 19.80 acres located in Hinds County, MS, 8.78 acres located in Hinds County, MS, 243.5 acres located in Hinds County, MS and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC v. 1.2 Acres In Hinds County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2008cv00373
Plaintiff: Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC, Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC, Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC and others
Defendant: 1.2 Acres In Hinds County, Mississippi, Barry G. Brunson, 2.03 Acres in Hinds, County, Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC v. 2.1 Acres Hinds County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2008cv00354
Plaintiff: Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC, Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC, Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC and others
Defendant: 2.1 Acres Hinds County, Mississippi, Wesley J. Wilson, Unknown Persons Having Interest In Said Property
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Real Property None
Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC v. 3.62 Acres in Hinds County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2008cv00345
Plaintiff: Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC, Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC, Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC and others
Defendant: 3.62 Acres in Hinds County, Mississippi, 0.94 Acres in Hinds County, Mississippi, 3.40 Acres in Hinds County, Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Real Property None
Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC v. 2.23 Acres in Smith County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2008cv00346
Plaintiff: Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC, Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC, Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC and others
Defendant: 2.23 Acres in Smith County, Mississippi, Dale Westbrook, Unknown Persons Having Interest In Said Property and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Real Property None
Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC v. 2.48 Aceres in Hinds County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2008cv00347
Plaintiff: Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC, Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC, Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC and others
Defendant: 2.48 Aceres in Hinds County, Mississippi, KC Oakley-Palestine Properties, LLC, Unknown Persons
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC v. 3.77 Acres & 4.91 Acres In Smith County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2008cv00348
Plaintiff: Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC, Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC, Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC and others
Defendant: 3.77 Acres & 4.91 Acres In Smith County, Mississippi, Raleigh Land and Timber Company, L. P., Unknown Persons
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Real Property None
Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC v. 6.65 Acres in Hinds County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2008cv00344
Plaintiff: Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC, Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC, Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC and others
Defendant: 6.65 Acres in Hinds County, Mississippi, Elizabeth Hand, L. C. Hand and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Real Property Both
Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC v. 2.69 Acres in Hinds County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2008cv00338
Plaintiff: Midcontinent Express Pipeline, LLC
Defendant: 2.69 Acres in Hinds County, Mississippi, Ray Herrington, Mary Herrington and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Real Property None

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?