US District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi Labor Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 134
Brown v. Mississippi State Senate
as 3:2011cv00678
Plaintiff:
Janice Brown
Defendant:
Mississippi State Senate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Southwell v. Chickasaw Nation Industries, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00648
Plaintiff:
Carlin Southwell
Defendant:
Chickasaw Nation Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilson v. G.A. Carmichael Family Health Center, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00534
Plaintiff:
Nancy G. Wilson
Defendant:
G.A. Carmichael Family Health Center, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Sonic Drive-In, Vicksburg, Halls Ferry Road, L.L.C. et al
as 5:2011cv00122
Plaintiff:
Norman Smith
Defendant:
Sonic Drive-In, Vicksburg, Halls Ferry Road, L.L.C. , Sonic Drive-In, Vicksburg, MS, L.L.C. , Sonic Drive-In Greenwood, Mississippi, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hill v. Skyhawke Technologies, LLC
as 3:2011cv00521
Plaintiff:
Eric D. Hill
Defendant:
Skyhawke Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Freeman v. Jackson Broadcasting Co., LLC
as 3:2011cv00520
Plaintiff:
Marion T. Freeman
Defendant:
Jackson Broadcasting Co., LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sims v. Weyerhaeuser Company
as 4:2011cv00132
Plaintiff:
Michael Sims
Defendant:
Weyerhaeuser Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Estate of Hite B. Wolcott v. Southeast Management Program of the AT&T Pension Benefit Plan
as 3:2011cv00512
Plaintiff:
Estate of Hite B. Wolcott
Defendant:
Southeast Management Program of the AT&T Pension Benefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Thompson et al v. Madison County, Mississippi
as 3:2011cv00438
Plaintiff:
Rodney Thompson and Josh Hobbs
Defendant:
Madison County, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ginn v. Copac, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00369
Plaintiff:
Debra Kay Ginn
Defendant:
Copac, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
