US District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma Prisoner Petitions Cases

General Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 101 - 110 of 1,182
Parker v Bridges
as 4:2022cv00340
Petitioner: Michael Gary Parker, Jr
Respondent: Carrie Bridges
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Clark v Crow
as 4:2022cv00334
Defendant: David George Clark and Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Franks v. Clayton We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00328
Petitioner: Avery Lloyd Franks
Respondent: Deon Clayton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sweet v. Clark
as 4:2022cv00329
Petitioner: Alexander Nicholaus Sweet
Respondent: Shannon Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simms v. Central Intelligence Agency
as 4:2022cv00318
Petitioner: Franklin S Simms
Respondent: Central Intelligence Agency
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hollan v. Crow
as 4:2022cv00313
Petitioner: Marion Dale Hollan
Respondent: Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Whitten
as 4:2022cv00307
Petitioner: Glendell Dewayne Lee
Respondent: Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rhodes v. State of Oklahoma
as 4:2022cv00293
Petitioner: Jerry Don Rhodes
Respondent: State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Louthan
as 4:2022cv00285
Petitioner: Damion L Johnson
Respondent: David Louthan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Downs v. Reed
as 4:2022cv00288
Petitioner: Edward Scott Downs
Respondent: Mike Reed
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?