US District Court for the District of Oregon Other Statutes Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 1,552
Climate Change Truth, Inc. v. Brown et al
as 3:2022cv00655
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Environment Quality, Kate Brown, Oregon Global Warming Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Climate Change Truth, Inc.
Banu et al v. United States Department of State et al
as 3:2022cv00606
Plaintiff:
Shamima Banu, Enamul Maqsud, Sabera Sultana and others
Defendant:
United States Department of State, U.S. Embassy, Dhaka, Bangladesh, Antony Blinken and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Parke Gordon, LLC v. PeaceHealth et al
as 6:2022cv00484
Plaintiff:
Parke Gordon, LLC
Defendant:
PeaceHealth and MRO Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Wicks et al v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv00446
Plaintiff:
Norman Wicks, Sr. and Norman Wicks, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Portland, Portland Police Dept. and Det. Mathew Brown
Ellis v. Fagan et al
as 3:2022cv00437
Plaintiff:
Kayla Ellis
Defendant:
Shemia Fagan, Joel Christiansen, Aaron Baker and others
Randelovic v. Stojanovic
as 3:2022cv00400
Petitioner:
Marija Miroslav Randelovic
Defendant:
Aleksandar Stojanovic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hinds v. I.Q. Data International, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00381
Plaintiff:
Marci Hinds
Defendant:
I.Q. Data International, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Silva v. Stach et al
as 3:2022cv00360
Plaintiff:
Troy L. Silva
Defendant:
Chris Stach and Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Rogers v. Mcpherson et al
as 3:2022cv00229
Plaintiff:
Mr. Clarence R. Rogers and Clarence R. Rogers
Defendant:
Aprilla D. Mcpherson, Donald R. Mcpherson, Clarence Rogers and others
James v. General Motors LLC
as 2:2022cv00221
Plaintiff:
Mark James
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
