US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Other Statutes Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 162
WRIGHT v. TRANSUNION, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv04536
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA WRIGHT
Defendant:
TRANSUNION, LLC , JOHN DOES 1-10 and X,Y,Z CORPORATIONS
Counter_claimant:
TRANSUNION, LLC
Counter_defendant:
PATRICIA WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION v. ALTER et al
as 2:2013cv03361
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
Defendant:
DENNIS J. ALTER and WILLIAM A. ROSOFF
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1811 Financial Inst. Reform Recov. & Enforc. Act of 1989
DIANGELUS v. CITYWIDE ATM
as 2:2013cv02462
Plaintiff:
VINCENT DIANGELUS
Defendant:
CITYWIDE ATM
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Transfer Act
KING v. TD. BANK, N.A.
as 2:2013cv01870
Plaintiff:
TONY DPHAX KING
Defendant:
TD. BANK, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MCCLAIN v. RBS CITIZEN'S BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2013cv01547
Plaintiff:
LISA MCCLAIN
Defendant:
RBS CITIZEN'S BANK, N.A. and CITIZEN'S BANK OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 3410
DICIOCCIO v. WOODY'S BAR et al
as 2:2013cv01523
Plaintiff:
DANIEL DICIOCCIO
Defendant:
WOODY'S BAR and DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693
CODY v. TRAVEL SHOP et al
as 2:2013cv01445
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN CODY
Defendant:
TRAVEL SHOP and DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Transfer Act
LOUIS v. ASIAN BANK
as 2:2013cv01447
Plaintiff:
CHERYL LOUIS
Defendant:
ASIAN BANK
Cause Of Action: Violation of Prov. of Subchpt.VI (Electronic Fund Transfers)
CODY v. CHESTNUT FRESHGROCER et al
as 2:2013cv01446
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN CODY
Defendant:
CHESTNUT FRESHGROCER and DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Transfer Act
MCDEVITT v. UNBS INC. et al
as 2:2013cv01424
Plaintiff:
JOHN MCDEVITT
Defendant:
UNBS INC., SAL'S OMEGA PIZZA INC. and DOES 1-5
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1693 Electronic Funds Transfer Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
