US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Real Property Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 83
BENEDICT et al v. SPRINGFIELD MALL POST OFFICE
as 2:2009cv00864
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
GREATER NEW YORK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. ELECTROLUX
as 2:2009cv00698
Plaintiff:
GREATER NEW YORK MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
ELECTROLUX
Cause Of Action: Diversity
RUSSELL v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv00390
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY M RUSSELL
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
LICIAGA v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv00391
Plaintiff:
CARMEN LICIAGA
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RAMIREZ v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv00389
Plaintiff:
LUCY RAMIREZ
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
POORMAN v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv00387
Plaintiff:
BERNICE POORMAN
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PHILLIPS v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv00385
Plaintiff:
WANDA PHILLIPS
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SHADDEN v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2009cv00382
Plaintiff:
ICYLE SHADDEN
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: Diversity
INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA v. GROSS-GIVEN MANUFACTURING COMPANY
as 2:2008cv00003
Plaintiff:
INDEMNITY INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
Defendant:
GROSS-GIVEN MANUFACTURING COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RIVERS v. THE HOLMES GROUP, INC.
as 2:2007cv03161
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE RIVERS
Defendant:
THE HOLMES GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
