US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania Labor Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 1,659
SU v. HASLAM PROPERTIES, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01232
Plaintiff:
JULIE A. SU
Defendant:
HASLAM PROPERTIES, LLC doing business as HOMEWELL OF SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA, LLC and EDWARD HASLAM
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
HAPLEA v. PLUMSTEADVILLE PUB, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01117
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER HAPLEA
Defendant:
PLUMSTEADVILLE PUB, LLC doing business as PLUMSTEADVILLE PUB and DETECTIVE JOHN KELLY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
WALLS et al v. K&C EEXECUTIVE PROTECTION LLC
as 2:2023cv01110
Plaintiff:
Andrew Walls, Brianna Brewer, Terrance Peters and others
Defendant:
K&C Executive Protection LLC
SU v. NEIGHBORS QUALITY HOME CARE, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv01096
Plaintiff:
JULIE SU
Defendant:
NEIGHBORS QUALITY HOME CARE, LLC and Ms. MELISSA GRAYSON
GISCHEL v. AGHSBH MARKETING & DISTRIBUTION, LP
as 5:2023cv00957
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE GISCHEL
Defendant:
AGHSBH MARKETING & DISTRIBUTION, LP doing business as AROOGA'S GRILLE HOUSE & SPORTS BAR
HOUTZ v. MELT RESTAURANT
as 5:2023cv00844
Plaintiff:
EMILY HOUTZ
Defendant:
PAXOS RESTAURANTS doing business as MELT RESTAURANT
RUSSO et al v. MILLER'S ALE HOUSE, INC.
as 2:2023cv00790
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINA RUSSO, LINDSEY JOHNSON and ERIC HELKOWSKI
Defendant:
MILLER'S ALE HOUSE, INC. doing business as MILLER'S ALE HOUSE
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
RAWLS v. KMCH, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00753
Plaintiff:
KHALEE RAWLS
Defendant:
KMCH, LLC doing business as HILLTOWN TAVERN, HILLTOWN 2, LLC doing business as HILLTOWN TAVERN, KAHLIL MIR and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
PASLO v. STATUS VALET CO., INC.
as 2:2023cv00708
Plaintiff:
DIANE PASLO
Defendant:
STATUS VALET CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
