US District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania Labor Cases
Cases 201 - 210 of 479
Moffitt v. The Program for Female Offenders of South Central Pennsylvania, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01114
Plaintiff:
Shalakemia Moffitt
Defendant:
The Program for Female Offenders of South Central Pennsylvania, Inc. and Carol C. Howard
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Dennis v. Manor Care of Pottsville PA, LLC et al
as 3:2016cv01053
Plaintiff:
Melanie Dennis
Defendant:
Manor Care of Pottsville PA, LLC and Heartland Employment Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Perez v. The County of Northumberland, Pennsylvania
as 4:2016cv00827
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Perez
Defendant:
The County of Northumberland, Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Billet v. Adept Corp.
as 1:2016cv00745
Plaintiff:
Glenn Billet
Defendant:
Adept Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Booher v. CMS Senior Care Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv00684
Plaintiff:
Yessenia Booher
Defendant:
CMS Senior Care Inc. and Christopher Smith
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Delaney v. FTS International Services, LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00662
Plaintiff:
Brandon Delaney
Defendant:
FTS International Services, LLC, J-W Energy Company and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wright v. Cenergy International Services
as 4:2016cv00580
Plaintiff:
Isaac Wright
Defendant:
Cenergy International Services
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Trevorah v. Linde Corporation
as 3:2016cv00492
Plaintiff:
Michael Trevorah
Defendant:
Linde Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Waltz v. Aveda Transportation and Energy Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv00469
Plaintiff:
Randy Waltz
Defendant:
Aveda Transportation and Energy Services, Inc. and Rodan Transport USA Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Liu v. BJW LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00430
Plaintiff:
Dong Chang Liu
Defendant:
BJW LLC , Judy Wu and John and Jane Doe #1-10
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
