US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee Federal Tax Suits Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 220
United States of America et al v. Garrott
as 3:2011cv00241
Petitioner:
United States of America and Roy Everidge
Respondent:
Daniel Garrott, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
United States of America et al v. Starling
as 3:2011cv00199
Petitioner:
United States of America and Eleanor Clark
Respondent:
Debra Starling
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
United States of America et al v. Starling
as 3:2011cv00201
Petitioner:
United States of America and Eleanor Clark
Respondent:
John Starling
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
McKinnie et al v. United States
as 2:2011cv00002
Plaintiff:
James F. McKinnie and Lonnie B. McKinnie
Defendant:
United States
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
United States of America v. Nutkis et al
as 3:2010cv01181
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Daniel S. Nutkis, Rosanne Kerwin and Melvyn S. Nutkis
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
In the matter of the Tax Indebtedness of George Alexander Henry, Jr.
as 3:2010mc00112
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
United States of America v. In the matter of the Tax Indebtedness of George Alexander Hendry, Jr.
as 3:2010cv00974
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
In the matter of the Tax Indebtedness of George Alexander Hendry, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
United States of America et al v. Turner
as 3:2010cv00914
Petitioner:
United States of America and William J. Sander
Respondent:
Ernest Turner
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
United States of America et al v. Dallas
as 3:2010cv00915
Plaintiff:
United States of America and William J. Sander
Defendant:
Bryce Dallas
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
United States of America et al v. Turner
as 3:2010cv00913
Plaintiff:
United States of America and William J. Sander
Defendant:
Ernest Turner
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
