US District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee Other Statutes Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 4,395
Doe (OA) v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00941
Plaintiff:
John Doe (OA) and Anthony Oliver
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00927
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Doe (T.W.) v. JRD Partnership et al
as 3:2023cv00928
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe (T.W.)
Defendant:
JRD Partnership doing business as Motel 6, G6 Hospitality, LLC, G6 Hospitality Franchising, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00893
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc. v. Ray et al
as 3:2023cv00878
Plaintiff:
Tennessee Riverkeeper, Inc.
Defendant:
Crystal Ray doing business as RR Farms aka RR Farms Mass Grading and Ricky Ray doing business as RR Farms aka RR Farms Mass Grading
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Doe (RB) v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00877
Plaintiff:
John Doe (RB)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Last Call Bar & Grill LLC et al
as 1:2023cv00050
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Last Call Bar & Grill LLC doing business as Last Call Bar & Grill and Dana Fann
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553 Communications Act of 1934
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Doe (GEA.1) v. Lee et al
as 3:2023cv00834
Plaintiff:
John Doe (GEA.1)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
