US District Court for the Northern District of Texas Contract Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 13,030
Randall v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv00873
Plaintiff:
R.D. Randall
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Patterson v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv00875
Plaintiff:
Brian Patterson
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Montanez v. Berkley Oil & Gas Specialty Services, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Jaime Montanez
Defendant:
Berkley Oil & Gas Specialty Services, LLC and Riverport Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Ernst v. Stryker Corporation et al
as 3:2024cv00854
Plaintiff:
Joel Ernst
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation and Stryker Employment Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
FCCI Insurance Company v. Roto, Inc. et al
as 6:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
FCCI Insurance Company
Defendant:
Roto, Inc., Thomas Halfmann, Melissa Halfmann and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Stover v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv00863
Plaintiff:
M. Andrew Stover
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Turner v. AT&T Inc
as 3:2024cv00864
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Turner
Defendant:
AT&T Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Breach of Contract
Killion v. Truist Bank et al
as 5:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Sheri Killion
Defendant:
Truist Bank and Lubbock National Bank, Lubbock, Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Huyler v. AT&T, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00847
Plaintiff:
Brandon Huyler
Defendant:
AT&T, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Quebracho Properties, LLC v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Quebracho Properties, LLC
Defendant:
Scottsdale Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
