US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 4,331
Viral DRM, LLC v. Friendly Chevrolet, Ltd. et al
as 3:2024cv00003
Plaintiff:
Viral DRM, LLC
Defendant:
Bailey Adventures, Ltd. doing business as Market Doctors and Friendly Chevrolet, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Fervo Energy Company v. Ormat Technologies, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
Fervo Energy Company
Defendant:
Ormat Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Linfo IP, LLC v. Athleta, Inc.
as 4:2023cv04839
Plaintiff:
Linfo IP, LLC
Defendant:
Athleta, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Big Will Enterprises, Inc. v. Autoliv, INC. et al
as 4:2023cv04847
Plaintiff:
BIG WILL ENTERPRISES INC. and Big Will Enterprises, Inc.
Defendant:
AUTOLIV, INC., AUTOLIV NORTH AMERICA, INC. and AUTOLIV ASP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Linfo IP, LLC v. Banana Republic, LLC
as 4:2023cv04841
Plaintiff:
Linfo IP, LLC
Defendant:
Banana Republic, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 4:2023cv04743
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 4:2023cv04736
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 4:2023cv04737
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 4:2023cv04738
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 4:2023cv04739
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
