US District Court for the Southern District of Texas Real Property Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 340
Harris Caprock v. Trippe Manufacturing Company
as 4:2015cv00130
Defendant:
Trippe Manufacturing Company and Tripp Lite Holdings, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Harris Caprock Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Leger v. Takata Corporation et al
as 4:2014cv03392
Defendant:
Takata Corporation, TK Holdings Inc, Honda Motor Co LTD and others
Plaintiff:
Monte Leger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Williams v. ConforMIS, Inc.
as 4:2014cv03258
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Williams
Defendant:
ConforMIS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martine v. ConforMIS, Inc.
as 4:2014cv02989
Plaintiff:
Mary Jane Martine
Defendant:
ConforMIS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newsome vs Cook Medical Incorporated et al
as 4:2014cv02815
Defendant:
Donna Newsome , Cook Medical Incorporated, Cook Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Armstrong v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 4:2014cv02690
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Pharmacia & Upjohn Co. and Watson Pharmaceuticals Inc
Plaintiff:
Peter John Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Locke et al v. Ethicon Inc et al
as 4:2014cv02648
Plaintiff:
Judy Locke , Donna Miller , Janete Adams and others
Defendant:
Ethicon Inc and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Allstate Insurance Co. v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
as 4:2014cv02471
Plaintiff:
Allstate Insurance Co
Defendant:
Electrolux Home Products, Inc. and John Doe Companies 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Faltesek et al v. Taser International, Inc
as 4:2014cv01296
Plaintiff:
Hazel Faltesek and Mary Heinlen
Defendant:
Taser International, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gamboa et al v. Centrifugal Casting Machine Company
as 4:2014cv01273
Plaintiff:
Hector Gamboa and Eugenia Gamboa
Defendant:
Centrifugal Casting Machine Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
