US District Court for the District of Wyoming Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 58
Stewart v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2014cv00176
Plaintiff:
Sandra J Stewart
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Kissell v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2014cv00038
Plaintiff:
Steven S Kissell
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Krening v. Union Pacific Railroad
as 2:2013cv00274
Plaintiff:
Henry E Krening
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
LeClair v. United States of America
as 2:2013cv00121
Plaintiff:
Elta May LeClair
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Gardea v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 2:2013cv00004
Plaintiff:
Raul Gardea
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, General Chemical Industrial Products Inc, Tata Chemicals North America Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Sluss v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2012cv00254
Plaintiff:
Timothy M Sluss
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Noggle v. BNSF Railway Company
as 2:2012cv00204
Plaintiff:
Harold J Noggle
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Johnson v. BNSF Railway Company
as 1:2012cv00077
Plaintiff:
Jerry L Johnson
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Stapert v. Dakota Minnesota and Eastern Railroad Corporation
as 2:2011cv00306
Plaintiff:
Brian Stapert
Defendant:
Dakota Minnesota and Eastern Railroad Corporation
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Gardea v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 2:2011cv00192
Plaintiff:
Raul Gardea
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, General Chemical Industrial Products Inc, Tata Chemicals North America Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
