US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Intellectual Property Cases

Patent Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 71 - 80 of 112
Madison Oslin Inc v. Madison Oslin Research Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2011cv01343
Plaintiff: Madison Oslin Inc and Madison Oslin Research Inc
Defendant: Interstate Resources Inc , Interstate Cambridge Container LLC , James Morgan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Homtex, Inc v. Leggett & Platt, Inc et al
as 5:2011cv01349
Plaintiff: Homtex, Inc
Defendant: Leggett & Platt, Inc and STS Linens, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
EBSCO Industries Inc v. Bass Pro Inc et al
as 2:2011cv00760
Plaintiff: EBSCO Industries Inc
Defendant: Bass Pro Inc and Big Game Products Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Karl Storz GMBH & Co. KG v. Integrated Medical Systems International, Inc
as 2:2010cv03547
Plaintiff: Karl Storz GMBH & Co. KG
Defendant: Integrated Medical Systems International, Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Delavan Limited v. Boyer et al
as 5:2010cv02192
Plaintiff: Delavan Limited
Defendant: Jason Todd Boyer, Boyco Industrial Sales and Boyco Industrial Sales LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Frontier Devices Inc v. minSURG Corporation Inc et al
as 2:2010cv01796
Plaintiff: Frontier Devices Inc
Defendant: minSURG Corporation Inc and minSURG International Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Nufix Inc et al v. minSURG Corporation Inc et al
as 2:2010cv01747
Plaintiff: Nufix Inc and Nutech Medical Inc
Defendant: minSURG Corporation Inc and minSURG International Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
McNaughton v. Strike King Lure Company et al
as 2:2010cv00932
Plaintiff: Braxton McNaughton
Defendant: Strike King Lure Company, Northland Fishing Tackle LLC, Pure Fishing Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Powell v. Proctor & Gamble Company, The
as 2:2010cv00487
Plaintiff: Elizabeth Powell
Defendant: Proctor & Gamble Company, The
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0292 False Marking - Marking with Patent Number that is expired
Calton v. The Proctor & Gamble Company et al
as 2:2010cv00406
Plaintiff: Marcus Calton, Marcus Calton, Marcus Calton and others
Defendant: The Proctor & Gamble Company, KAZ, Incorporated and KAZ USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0292 False Marking - Marking with Patent Number that is expired

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?