US District Court for the Northern District of Alabama Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 111 - 120 of 457
LINE-X Franchising LLC et al v. Calnan et al
as 5:2016cv01400
Plaintiff:
LINE-X Franchising LLC and LINE-X LLC
Defendant:
Ramsey Calnan, Katie Calnan and Calnan Enterprises Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Crutchfield Dermatology PA et al v. Riggins et al
as 4:2016cv00985
Plaintiff:
Crutchfield Dermatology PA and Dr. Charles E Crutchfield, III
Defendant:
Dr. Murray J Riggins, Jr and Doc Riggins Enterprises LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Abbott et al v. Wagonheim et al
as 2:2016cv00886
Plaintiff:
Matt Abbott and Abbott Law Firm LLC, The
Defendant:
Eliot Wagonheim and Wagonheim & Associates LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Wooten v. Herndon et al
as 2:2016cv00839
Plaintiff:
Neal Wooten
Defendant:
Mark Herndon and The Fresh Ink Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Robertson v. Kardashian
as 2:2016cv00827
Plaintiff:
Daniel Matthew Robertson
Defendant:
Armen Kardashian
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Glennon v. Doe et al
as 5:2016cv00804
Plaintiff:
Monika Glennon
Defendant:
John Doe, 1 and John Doe, 2
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Xpansion Holdings LLC v. Retail Coach, LLC, The
as 2:2016cv00513
Plaintiff:
Xpansion Holdings LLC
Defendant:
Retail Coach, LLC, The
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121
Advanced Structural Design Inc v. Hopkins et al
as 5:2016cv00449
Plaintiff:
Advanced Structural Design Inc
Defendant:
Bill Hopkins, Morgan County (Alabama) Board of Education, Volkert Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abbott et al v. Wright et al
as 2:2016cv00399
Plaintiff:
Matt Abbott and Abbott Law Firm LLC, The
Defendant:
James Wright and Damages Inc LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Guntersville Breathables Inc v. Global Glove & Safety Manufacturing Inc
as 5:2016cv00387
Plaintiff:
Guntersville Breathables Inc
Defendant:
Global Glove & Safety Manufacturing Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
