US District Court for the Eastern District of California Other Statutes Cases

Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 282
Wonderful Real Estate Development LLC v. Laborers International Union of North America Local 220 et al
as 1:2019at00225
Defendant: Laborers International Union of North America Local 220, Ernesto J. Ordonez, Southern California District Council of Laborers and others
Plaintiff: Wonderful Real Estate Development LLC
Cause Of Action: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Wonderful Real Estate Development LLC v. Laborers International Union of North America Local 220 et al
as 1:2019cv00416
Defendant: Laborers International Union of North America Local 220, Ernesto J. Ordonez, Southern California District Council of Laborers and others
Plaintiff: Wonderful Real Estate Development LLC
Cause Of Action: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Planned Parenthood Federation of America et al v. Center for Medical Progress & BioMax et al
as 2:2019mc00056
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains, Planned Parenthood Center for Choice, Planned Parenthood Pasadena & San Gabriel Valley, Inc. and others
Defendant: David Daleiden, Center for Medical Progress & BioMax
Cause Of Action: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lantz Retirement Investments, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company et al v. Brian Glover, an individual et al
as 1:2019at00207
Defendant: Frontier Management, an Oregon Limited Liability Company, Brian Glover, an individual, Mark Smith, an individual and others
Plaintiff: Milo Eugene Watson and Patricia A. Watson, as Trustees of the Watson Living Trust dated April 11, 2001, Anita B. Hashim and Annette Davis, as Trustees Hashim Family Trust dated March 28, 1990, Arthur and Annette L. Davis, as Trustees of the Davis Family Trust dated May 27, 1994 and others
Cause Of Action: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Lantz Retirement Investments, LLC v. Brian Glover, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv00379
Plaintiff: Milo Eugene Watson, Verdi S. Boyer, Stanley R. Hughes and others
Defendant: Brian Glover, Newmark Grubb ASU & Associates, Mark Smith and others
Cause Of Action: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Planned Parenthood Federation of America et al v. Center for Medical Progress & BioMax et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019mc00009
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains, Planned Parenthood Center for Choice, Planned Parenthood Pasadena & San Gabriel Valley, Inc. and others
Defendant: Troy Newman, Center for Medical Progress & BioMax, Gerardo Lopez Lopez and others
Undetermined: Planned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo, Inc.
Respondent: StemExpress, LLC, Sarah Heuston
Planned Parenthood Federation of America et al v. Center for Medical Progress & BioMax
as 2:2019at00042
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood of the Rocky Mountains, Planned Parenthood Center for Choice, Planned Parenthood Pasadena & San Gabriel Valley, Inc. and others
Defendant: Troy Newman, Center for Medical Progress & BioMax, Gerardo Lopez Lopez and others
Undetermined: Planned Parenthood Shasta-Diablo, Inc.
Planned Parenthood of the Pacific Southwest v. Daleiden et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019mc00002
Defendant: Center for Medical Progress & BioMax, David Daleiden, BioMax Procurement Services, LLC
Plaintiff: Planned Parenthood of the Pacific Southwest
(PS) Flannery-Galabov v. District Attorney Superior Court of California We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv02667
Plaintiff: Sebastian Mitchel Flannery-Galabov
Defendant: District Attorney Superior Court of California
Cause Of Action: Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
(PS) 3AI Properties LLC v. Abbett et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv02345
Defendant: Daun Abbett, Greg Lloyd, Ram Construction and others
Other: Kristina Karkanen
Plaintiff: 3AI Properties LLC
Cause Of Action: Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?