U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Intellectual Property Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 4,491
TIMELESS PRODUCTION FZ LLC. v. HA et al
as 3:2025cv03639
Plaintiff:
TIMELESS PRODUCTION FZ LLC.
Defendant:
TRAN VAN HA and VIECONNECT VIETNAM TECHNOLOGY AND SERVICES INVESTMENT COMPANY LIMITED
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Cartee et al v. Le Huffington Post SAS
as 5:2025cv03643
Plaintiff:
Ryan Cartee, Nicholas Ryan Gorman, Chris Jackson and others
Defendant:
Le Huffington Post SAS
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
August Image, LLC v. Koreaboo, Inc. et al
as 5:2025cv03623
Plaintiff:
August Image, LLC
Defendant:
Koreaboo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Gladwin v. Doe
as 4:2025cv03370
Plaintiff:
Andrew Gladwin
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Comeback Media, Inc. v. Particle Media, Inc. et al
as 3:2025cv03298
Plaintiff:
Combeback Media, Inc.
Defendant:
Particle Media, Inc. d/b/a NEWSBREAK, a Delaware Corporation and Total Impulse Sport
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Bezirgan v. Times Internet Limited
as 4:2025cv03224
Plaintiff:
Abdusselam Bezirgan
Defendant:
Times Internet Limited
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Moon v. Window Innovations Inc.
as 4:2025cv03180
Plaintiff:
Jeenah Moon
Defendant:
Window Innovations Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Actian Corporation v. ASHLEY FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, LLC
as 3:2025cv03141
Plaintiff:
Actian Corporation
Defendant:
ASHLEY FURNITURE INDUSTRIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.222.146.46
as 3:2025cv03103
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe subscriber assigned IP address 73.222.146.46
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
