US District Court for the Northern District of California Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 2,060
Brooks v. O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv02687
Plaintiff:
Noah N Brooks
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Alessi v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv02689
Plaintiff:
Frances Alessi
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Miner v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv02685
Plaintiff:
Gara Miner
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Bates v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv02611
Plaintiff:
Omari Rashad Bates
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Bradshaw v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv02490
Plaintiff:
Anne Bradshaw
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Li v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv02501
Plaintiff:
Siming Li
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley and SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Ruiz v. O'Malley
as 7:2024cv02186
Plaintiff:
Miguel Castro Ruiz
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA (INTERESTED PARTY / NEF)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Penngrath v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv02177
Plaintiff:
Arthur Penngrath
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Heredia v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv02178
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Heredia
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Barnett v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv02141
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Barnett
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
