U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California Federal Tax Suits Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 825
Ho v. Internal Revenue Service/ Department of Treasury
as 4:2024cv02410
Plaintiff:
Jian-Ci Ho
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service/ Department of Treasury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ho v. Internal Revenue Service/ Department of Treasury
as 5:2024cv02408
Plaintiff:
Jian-Ci Ho
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service/ Department of Treasury
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BMR Health Services, Inc. v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv01884
Plaintiff:
BMR Health Services, Inc. and BMR Health Services, Inc
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Tomkinson v. USA
as 3:2024cv01638
Plaintiff:
Robert Tomkinson
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6702 IRS: Refund of Income Tax Penalty
Ho v. The United States of America
as 4:2024cv01538
Plaintiff:
Jian-Ci Ho
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
United States of America v. Vella et al
as 3:2024cv01094
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Tony G. Vella, Gloria Monroy de Vella, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7401 IRS: Tax Liability
San Francisco Culinary Bartenders and Service Employees Welfare Fund et al v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 5:2024cv00780
Plaintiff:
San Francisco Culinary Bartenders and Service Employees Welfare Fund, Robert Berger, Michael Casey and others
Defendant:
Department of Treasury, United States of America, Internal Revenue Service and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
Rojas et al v. Internal Revenue Service et al
as 3:2024cv00725
Plaintiff:
Cesar A. Rojas and Greysa E. Ramirez
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
