US District Court for the Northern District of California Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 2,443
Castro et al v. Lowe's Home Center, LLC
as 5:2024cv01902
Plaintiff:
MARIA CASTRO, an individual and FERNANDO CASTRO, an individual
Defendant:
LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC, a Corporation doing business in the state of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
King v. Navy Federal Credit Union
as 3:2024cv01919
Plaintiff:
Troy Demond King
Defendant:
Navy Federal Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
King v. The Lapham Company et al
as 4:2024cv01923
Plaintiff:
Troy Demond King
Defendant:
The Lapham Company, Marcella Hardy, Alameda County Bar Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Zayas et al v. Universal Health Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01837
Plaintiff:
Antonio Zayas and Svetlana Narbaeva
Defendant:
Universal Health Services, Inc. and Fremont Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Shaw et al v. Q&D Construction, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv01786
Plaintiff:
Bergit Shaw and Dockum Shaw
Defendant:
Q&D Construction, LLC and County of Sonoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
B.W. v. Airbnb, Inc.
as 3:2024cv01770
Plaintiff:
B. W.
Defendant:
Airbnb, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith v. Yeti Coolers, LLC
as 1:2024cv01703
Plaintiff:
Taylor Smith
Defendant:
Yeti Coolers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Schwab v. Vo
as 3:2024cv01694
Plaintiff:
Jason Schwab
Defendant:
Hoang Ngoc Vo and Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Gristi v. United States Postal Service, et al
as 3:2024cv01706
Plaintiff:
Denise Gristi
Defendant:
US Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Rosas v. Jumio, Inc.
as 5:2024cv01716
Plaintiff:
Sara Rosas
Defendant:
Jumio, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
