US District Court for the Southern District of California Contract Cases
Cases 161 - 170 of 202
Pacific Pulp Molding, Inc. v. Burchfield et al
as 3:2015cv01602
Plaintiff:
Pacific Pulp Molding, Inc.
Defendant:
Terry Burchfield , Kathy Burchfied and DOES 1 through 20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DSC Products, Inc. v. Leduc Gift & Specialty, LLC et al
as 3:2015cv01249
Plaintiff:
DSC Products, Inc.
Defendant:
Leduc Gift & Specialty, LLC, Three Two Eight LLC, 4Brava LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Demison et al v. Walgreen Co. Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00306
Plaintiff:
Danielle Demison and Teri Spano
Defendant:
Walgreen Co. Inc. and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Container Store, Inc., The v. Lush Life International, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00601
Plaintiff:
Container Store, Inc., The
Defendant:
Lush Life International, Inc. and Susan Frank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Clark v. LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00485
Plaintiff:
Jeanette Clark
Defendant:
LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. and Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
AALTO Scientific, LTD v. Wheaton Industries, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv02972
Plaintiff:
AALTO Scientific, LTD
Defendant:
Wheaton Industries, Inc. and DOES 1 through 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Kaplan v. Arctic Zero, Inc.
as 3:2012cv02544
Plaintiff:
Judy Kaplan
Defendant:
Arctic Zero, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Freeman v. Arctic Zero, Inc.
as 3:2012cv02279
Plaintiff:
Brenda Freeman
Defendant:
Arctic Zero, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Glenn v. BAI Brands, LLC et al
as 3:2012cv01953
Plaintiff:
Austin Glenn
Defendant:
BAI Brands, LLC and Does 1-25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Newman v. De'Longhi America
as 3:2012cv01618
Plaintiff:
Mickey Newman
Defendant:
De'Longhi America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
