Southern District of California Social Security Cases

Supplemental Security Income Cases, Dockets and Filings

Cases filed


Cases 1 - 10 of 633
Pena v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv01822
Plaintiff: Marina Pena
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Matto v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv01808
Plaintiff: Giovanni Luigi Matto
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rodriguez v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv01788
Plaintiff: Filiberto Rodriguez
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: Social Security Benefits
Henderson v. Berryhill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv01752
Plaintiff: Ronald Ray Henderson
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Irving et al v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv01730
Plaintiff: Lisa Marie Irving , Amy Bonano , National Federation of the Blind, Inc.
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: Job Discrimination (Handicap)
Barkzai v. Berryhill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv01692
Plaintiff: Soraya Barkzai
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Stone v. Berryhill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv01689
Plaintiff: Shelley E. Stone
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Argue et al v. Commissioner of the Social Security Admin.
as 3:2017cv01677
Plaintiff: Matthew W. Argue, Michelle Argue
Defendant: Commissioner of the Social Security Admin.
Cause Of Action: Supplemental Security Income benefits (SSID)
Blackmon v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv01669
Plaintiff: Brian David Blackmon
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Johnson v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv01647
Plaintiff: David L. Johnson
Defendant: Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: Review of HHS Decision (regarding payment of benefits)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?