US District Court for the Southern District of California Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 152
Fisher v. Olsen
as 3:2016cv02477
Plaintiff:
Mary Jane Fisher
Defendant:
United States of Amercica
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Sorce v. Parawest Management Real Estate et al
as 3:2016cv02379
Plaintiff:
Joseph Sorce, Jr.
Defendant:
Parawest Management Real Estate, Crystle Springs Real Estate and College Grove Apartments
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
OBI Pharma, Inc. v. Does 1 through 20
as 3:2016cv02218
Plaintiff:
OBI Pharma, Inc.
Defendant:
Does 1 through 20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Child Welfare Services et al
as 3:2016cv02217
Plaintiff:
Don Williams
Defendant:
Child Welfare Services, Brooke Guild and Kinnary Jongcharoeun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McNeely Jr. v. A.V. Booter Inc., et al
as 3:2016cv02107
Plaintiff:
Manuel Ernest McNeely Jr.
Defendant:
A.V. Booter Inc. and Raul Barajas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Lash v. Starr et al
as 3:2016cv02064
Defendant:
Christopher Lash
Plaintiff:
Troy Starr , Tana Starr and Brandon Starr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chism Jr. v. State of California
as 3:2016cv01337
Plaintiff:
William Ray Chism Jr.
Defendant:
State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Camacho et al v. United States of America et al
as 3:2016cv01343
Plaintiff:
Omar Camacho and Christian Camacho
Defendant:
United States of America , U.S. Customs and Border Protection and Does 1 through 20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
White v. Universal Protections et al
as 3:2016cv01285
Plaintiff:
Ennis E. White
Defendant:
Universal Protections, Thomas Szotek #4790 and Metropolitan Transit System
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Youngevity International Corp. et al v. DOES 1-10
as 3:2016cv00965
Plaintiff:
Youngevity International Corp. and David Briskie
Defendant:
DOES 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
