District of California Contract Cases
Franchise Cases, Dockets and Filings
Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 405
Synergy HomeCare Franchising LLC v. Han et al
as 3:2017cv04505
Plaintiff:
Synergy Homecare Franchising, LLC
Defendant:
John Han , Alice Lai-Bitker , Veris Eastbay Homecare Incorporated
and others
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Maaco Franchising, LLC v. Elsayed
as 3:2017cv03711
Plaintiff:
Maaco Franchising, LLC
Defendant:
Ahmad Elsayed
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Breach of Contract
Taneja v. Bennigan's Franchising Company, LLC
as 4:2017cv03519
Defendant:
Bennigan's Franchising Company, LLC
Plaintiff:
Narender Taneja
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal
Mathew Enterprise, Inc. v. FCA US, LLC
as 5:2017cv03251
Plaintiff:
Mathew Enterprise, Inc.
Defendant:
FCA US, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity-Other Contract
Laws v. Laws et al
as 2:2017cv00525
Plaintiff:
William Laws
Defendant:
Carolyn Laws
Cause Of Action: Petition for Removal
Carls Jr. Restaurants LLC v. Frontera Star Foods, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01913
Defendant:
Juan Antonio Garza Mourey, Frontera Star Foods, LLC, Inversiones Mexte, S. de. R.L. C.V.
and others
Plaintiff:
Carls Jr. Restaurants LLC
DNZ Automotive Inc v. Econo Lube N Tune LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01620
Plaintiff:
DNZ Automotive Inc
Defendant:
Does, Driven Brands Inc, Econo Lube N Tune LLC
DNZ Automotive Inc v. Econo Lube N Tune LLC et al
as 8:2017cv00368
Cross Defendant:
DNZ Automotive Inc, Roes, Engin Ulug
Plaintiff:
DNZ Automotive Inc
Defendant:
Does, Driven Brands Inc, Econo Lube N Tune LLC
Cross Claimant:
Driven Brands Inc, Econo Lube N Tune LLC
Unlimited Prepaid, Inc. v. Airvoice Wireless Express, LLC
as 2:2017cv01409
Defendant:
Air Voice Wireless, LLC, Airvoice Wireless Express, LLC
Plaintiff:
Unlimited Prepaid, Inc.
Lyncroft Advisors, Inc. et al v. City Wide Franchise Co, Inc.
as 2:2016cv09642
Defendant:
City Wide Franchise Co, Inc., Does
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Gilbert, Lyncroft Advisors, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
