California Other Statutes Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 1,068
Regina Williamson v. Triangle Construction, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01233
Plaintiff:
Regina Williamson
Defendant:
Triangle Construction, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Steven Kern v. Forward Sunset Inc.
as 2:2024cv01237
Plaintiff:
Steven Kern
Defendant:
Forward Sunset, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Anthony Kamel v. Albertsons Companies, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Anthony Kamel
Defendant:
Albertsons Companies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Warren Eugene Ingram v. Epione Medical Corporation
as 2:2024cv01108
Plaintiff:
Warren Eugene Ingram
Defendant:
Epione Medical Corporation
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Jorge Alejandro Rojas v. MVP Remodeling Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00960
Defendant:
Yosef Vaizman, MVP Remodeling Inc, Richie Pan and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge Alejandro Rojas
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Tehrani v. Kidder Mathews of California, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00619
Plaintiff:
Payam Tehrani
Defendant:
Kidder Mathews of California, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Radvansky v. SOURCiS, Inc.
as 2:2024at00119
Plaintiff:
Ethan Radvansky
Defendant:
SOURCiS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Azar v. Renewal By Andersen, LLC
as 2:2024at00118
Plaintiff:
Farah Azar
Defendant:
Renewal By Andersen, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Azar v. Renewal By Andersen, LLC
as 2:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Farah Azar
Defendant:
Renewal By Andersen, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Radvansky v. SOURCiS, Inc.
as 2:2024cv00396
Plaintiff:
Ethan Radvansky
Defendant:
SOURCiS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
