California Real Property Cases
Cases 101 - 110 of 6,866
Rueben Rivero et al v. Specialized Loan Servicing LLC et al
as 8:2023cv02182
Plaintiff:
Rueben Rivero and Josefina Rivero
Defendant:
Specialized Loan Servicing LLC, Affinia Default Services LLC and Does 1-50 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
De Jesus Guzman Herrera v. All Men
as 3:2023cv02109
Plaintiff:
Teresita De Jesus Guzman Herrera
Defendant:
All Men
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 rp Diversity-Real Property
Linda Lawson Cooley v. Nina Chung et al
as 2:2023cv09697
Plaintiff:
Linda Lawson Cooley
Defendant:
Nina Chung and Does 1 to 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Big Washington LLC v. Matthew Hintze et al
as 2:2023cv09627
Plaintiff:
Big Washington LLC
Defendant:
Matthew Hintze, Iron Rock Ventures, LLC, Superdudes LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
U.S. Bank Trust National Association v. Cesar Morales et al
as 2:2023cv09597
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank Trust National Association
Defendant:
Cesar Morales, Norma Morales, Does 1 through X inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Michael Green, Inc. v. Anderson
as 5:2023cv02318
Plaintiff:
Michael Green, Inc.
Defendant:
Jason Anderson
Bliss v. Quality Loan Service Corporation et al
as 2:2023at01149
Plaintiff:
Kay Bliss
Defendant:
Quality Loan Service Corporation, Kevin McCarthy, Rochelle Matkin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
(PS) Bliss v. Quality Loan Service Corp.,et al
as 2:2023cv02614
Plaintiff:
Kay Bliss
Defendant:
Quality Loan Service Corporation, Kevin McCarthy, Rochelle Matkin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Michael Green, Inc. v. Bonta
as 5:2023cv02284
Plaintiff:
Michael Green, Inc.
Defendant:
Attorney General Rob Bonta
Michael Green, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv02283
Plaintiff:
Michael Green, Inc.
Petitioner:
ROBERT ANDRES BONTA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
