US District Court for the District of Connecticut Other Statutes Cases
Cases 121 - 130 of 156
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc v. Rodriguez
as 3:2010cv01772
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc
Defendant:
Paolo Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553
Integrated Sports Media Inc v. Karam et al
as 3:2010cv01765
Plaintiff:
Integrated Sports Media Inc
Defendant:
Philippe Ibrahim Karam, Maria Aparecida Abud and K&N Grill, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc v. Correnti
as 3:2010cv01768
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc
Defendant:
Michael Correnti
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553
J&J Sports Productions Inc v. Rodriguez
as 3:2010cv01771
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Paulo C. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553
J&J Sports Productions Inc v. Lautenbach
as 3:2010cv01773
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions Inc
Defendant:
Elizabeth Lautenbach
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553
Integrated Sports Media Inc v. Martins
as 3:2010cv01767
Plaintiff:
Integrated Sports Media Inc
Defendant:
Porfirio Martins and Casanova's Restaurant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553
Integrated Sports Media Inc v. Filva et al
as 3:2010cv01766
Plaintiff:
Integrated Sports Media Inc
Defendant:
Sandra Filva and Copacabana Cafe
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553
King Vision Pay-Per-View, Ltd. v. Contreras
as 3:2006cv00852
Plaintiff:
King Vision Pay-Per-View, Ltd.
Defendant:
Jose Contreras
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Eaddy et al
as 3:2010cv01387
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Shalika K. Eaddy and Black Rock Sports Cafe, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0553
Dish Network LLC et al v. Shah et al
as 3:2009cv02046
Plaintiff:
Dish Network LLC, Dish Network LLC, EchoStar Tech LLC and others
Defendant:
Mahammad Shah, Shah Arjumand, Wireless Link LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
